Cysts and the City

Sarah Jessica Parker as mulch.

Please don't misunderstand me. I have nothing against Sarah Jessica Parker. She has done very well for herself. She made "Sex and the City" shine and vice versa.

And I really don't care why she chose to have the "Sex and the City Movie" premiere in London rather than New York, even though it doesn't make a bit of sense. The show and the movie have all been about New York City, why then premiere the movie in the U.K.?

The co-stars of the movie, Kim Cattrall, Kristen Davis and Cynthia Nixon all showed up at the London premiere dressed as one would expect they would for a premiere.

For some reason, SJP decided to attend the premiere dressed as decaying vegetable matter on the floor of the forest. Her headgear clearly is the top of an acorn. Does that mean what holds it up is the rest of the nut? Skull as squirrel fodder?

I should be used to Ms. Parker dressing like a train wreck, and so I will give her a pass on her bizarre outfit. She has a cute little body and perhaps can carry it off.

What really bothers me are the growths on her face. She has cysts between her bottom lip and chin that seem to be getting bigger. When I look at her I don't see the shiny tresses, the smoky eyes, the flower pot on her head. I see growths.

Now surely Ms. Parker can afford to have them removed. Keeping them does not make her less of a millionaire, more like us common folk, or a better actress.

Is she wearing strange hats to distract us from the things growing on her face?